There was an error in this gadget

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Mark Lynas etc.

There is perhaps a certain discomfort about the fact that one of the best options for tackling global warming just so happens to be a technology that greens had spent decades opposing before climate change even hit the agenda. I have lost count of the number of times I have heard green groups insisting that climate change is the "greatest challenge ever to face humanity". Yet their refusal to reassess their inherited positions against nuclear power suggest that none of them actually believe what they are saying – or that most environmentalists are prepared to take refuge in ideologically motivated wishful thinking even when the future of the planet is at stake.

What Italy's nuclear referendum means for climate change

Six Steps to Hell

(Reuters) - A halving of a global nuclear power expansion after Japan's Fukushima disaster would increase global growth in carbon dioxide emissions by 30 percent through 2035, the IEA said on Wednesday.

The International Energy Agency warned last month that a political goal to limit climate change to safer levels was barely achievable after global emissions rose by near 6 percent in 2010.


Nuclear retreat to add 30 percent to CO2 growth: IEA

1 comment:

  1. And then there is Germany. Certainly one of the smartest best run countries ending nuclear power over the next 10 years.

    ReplyDelete